…. As a follower of Sufism Sufi Dervish also. Transcendent instinctively, the human analog true perception of the around world takes place at all four philosophies. It is spiritual experiences, which seem not objectively accessible as such. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Richard LeFrak has to say. In addition to this have We also still have an analog emotitional-intuitive sense world (pleasure frustration principle).
Each has its individual true will. We are trying to connect us with the meta level of our worlds. These can be described by us, due to their meta level, only with the indefinite noun ‘God’. Anyone can think rationally only what he knows and what he has seen pictures from our world. Our brain thinks in pictures! Therefore, no one knows what he doesn’t know! So can nobody feel maximum connection there (transcendence) relating to the meta level, people think among world? For God, the afterlife (heaven or hell) or infinity, no Lebende(r) has a personal experience and hence not prior position based on experience. Near-death experiences are individually subjective spiritual interpretation in the religious and esoteric area of an emergency situation.
We remember: the idea of God evolved from the natural religious ancestor worship deceased ancestors in mists. We owe the Foundation of the Western thinking world including Socrates. I know that I know nothing”is a winged word that is attributed to the Greek philosopher Socrates as distorting shortening of a quotation from Plato’s apology. The quote is in Plato for the development of own knowledge of the debunking of apparent knowledge of deliberate ignorance and wisdom as knowledge of the good. It attracts later reports about Plato’s unwritten doctrine, the essence of good as identical with the absolute one can be understood. Socratic ignorance knowledge thus initiated a dialectical way, which leads to the knowledgeable ignorance of absolute transcendence. We owe a further basis for the Western thinking world Rene Descartes, is to focus on the rational thinking world and neglect the emotional true will. This one-sided orientation later led to the industrialization. Cogito ergo sum (I think, therefore I am.”) It is the first “Principle of the philosopher of Rene Descartes, the he to to radical doubts the own knowledge ability as no further kritisierbares Foundation in his Meditationes de prima philosophia (1641) formulated and methodologically justified: that still I am it, doubt, I can doubt himself no longer, even if it is dreaming or fantasizing this ego,.” By Quelle/(C)…, author the basic intermediate human feelings are sympathy and empathy. Ethics is a transzendende sensation of good and evil (right or wrong, too much or too little, promoting or retardant). This is however very often thwarted by religious morals of (political, traditional). This very clearly demonstrate the when, the persecution and the Islamists! So we go the natural way: the subjective coherence of knowledge obtaining, without discursive use of mind, so without conscious conclusions and reasons. (C) 2012 copyright by Wolfgang Schwalm, specialist for systemic communication, all rights reserved! 12.05.2012