Estudoprofundo of we ourselves in will give the mathematical evidence to them for which ficaremoscertos, if in our thought it has some thing that has different principle denossas laws or if they are only manifestations and combinations of these same laws, enos it will teach the true job of the directions and the reflection. The knowledge that we have of the directions in them offers to asseguintes truths: That certain bodies only have a likeable, proper force to move this or that direction. That the nerves with the irritability property are the essential part of the directions. That the same likeable bodies do not walk in the directions seno until where if they find the nerves and that nothing more they make that to shock them and to communicate its impression to them. It is known therefore, the truth of the two last ones results eque, being born the man in the great theater of the nature, depending on it, needed agencies that served to it of instrument to form the league comaquelas parts of the nature on that it depended, and that it they were guides segurospara, for them, to look for what it agreed to it and to run away from what it he was harmful. Here it is here the usefulness of the directions: for them we do not know the nature in itself, external anatureza; but, for our feelings caused for them, we feel aimpresso that the external objects make on us, that it is how much is enough to parapodermos to provide our conservation and good to be. It can be observed that ossentidos and the reflection does not give in them, in them do not present objects, but somenteso occasion of that the soul develops, puts in exercise its facultieses. They are, therefore, the sensations the first material of the human knowledge, considered in relation to the objects cause that them, and carried aosmesmos for a habit contracted since the first moments from our existnciapor a done instinct of the necessity to mark objects that they must serconhecidos in them for the influence that exercises on us.
key: subjectivity, individual, Red as the sky. Introduction This article has the pretension to reflect sobrequestes related to the concept of subjectivity in the universe of psychology aluz of the vises of Gonzlez Rey (2004) and Hisses Lane (2002). Pontua algunsaspectos of the Red film As the Sky, in the attempt to relate the theory to the practical one. We will see, therefore, as asubjetividade goes gained space and, leaving of the agreement of such concept, it becomes to emerge the valuation of> particular experiences of eindivduos groups with its respective codes and of worlds with different eobjetivos fields. Beyond the recognition of a heterogeneidade inside of a singularity. What in them it is clearly is that we need to understand the subjectivity concept to inside paragarantir an understanding of the meanings constructed for the citizen deuma complexity which is conditional for history and determined by the culture. Subjectivity, a new model the emergency of the subjectivity ocorrequando sciences by itself does not give to account of a bigger universe of the man nocontexto where it lives without making opposition of man x object.
Rey (2004), nosseus studies on the Emergency of the Citizen and the subjectivity go in saying queos to them to know in different fields had not obtained more to legitimize to its rules universal porfilosofias of history. For the author, they had lost legitimacy osdiscursos totalizantes and universal and that practical the scientific ones, polticasmodernas must be thought about terms of a subjectivity. In the several camposdas sciences human beings is observed today a trend in if redefining them discursosem lathe of the truth ideas/falseness, objetividade/subjectivity as formade to bring a new dimension in the subject relation/object. The citizen is it in siou the society, not, exists without the other; objective the object not existeespecificamente without the citizen of it was part: The sensible category allows to visualize aespecificidade of psique human being and to incorporate an attribute to the social one: the cartersubjetivo of the social processes.
Galyuton, known in his time as a mathematician, journalist, criminologist. However, his assumption that intelligence is dependent on the speed, accuracy and ability perception is false. At the end of the last century French scientist A. Binet also engaged in the measurement of intelligence. Impelled him to this purely practical task: the French minister of education has entrusted him to create a method by which it might be an early aged children to recognize the mentally retarded, to train them in institutions.
Binet and Simon, his assistant gave the study of this problem for 10 years. They chose a different path than Galton, and he was right. Binet and Simon analizirovali tasks that children receive from teachers, also proposed its own, covering a variety of industries related to thinking, which, respectively, the solution was evaluated. In 1905, established the first scale to assess the level of intelligence. Then it was repeatedly altered, in particular, an American scientist L. Terman of Stanford University in California. Stanford-Binet test, along with other uses and now. Binet IQ Test was standardized.
This means that each individual test result is influenced by the average assessment in general. The practice has helped to place the job in such a manner as to their complexity was on the increase and that 50% of the respondents were not could solve more than half of the proposed tasks. After processing the results of the test, each subject took a definite position on the scale of measurement. Consequently, the test did not give an answer, this intellectual person or not, it simply defines his place in the scale of 50 to 150 points.