Along with these of itself far-reaching changes and obviously interconnected with them, we are witnessing a change in the productive, employment patterns and subsistence, leading to a new model of social organization, which cannot be said with accuracy as being, but can risk to be quite different from the prevailing hitherto. Model which are traumatically diluted to our daily lives, is that known as industrial society. One of its features is the divorce of the functions of production and consumption. Before that model was taken as such, was common that people produced an important part of products consumed, particularly helped by his family framework, which was large. Those patterns of prosumers, remained in the rural areas, to grandparents of the current adult generation. They were times of the home or domestic economy, where almost all foods produced or manufactured NT.

Where you sewed and you mend clothes and even shoes, as well as other complementary tasks. At first glance, this behaviour seemed spontaneous or fruit of the need, more deepening the analysis of the little, perceived that there were deliberate public policies that encouraged this type of economy. There is plenty of material about this attitude, and in this regard can consult the Almanac of the Ministry of agriculture, which was published annually from 1925 to 1954, and which still can be found in many old libraries of our peoples. But there was a time, that in Argentina, as a reflection of the global situation, began to impose employment in factories, in private offices and was accentuated ostensibly public employment.Agricultural mechanization resulted in minor demands of labor to rural chores. And so, for more than half a century, the model was taken as a valid reference. Among other consequences, those were abandoned practice of the home or domestic economy.In fact employment never reached for all, the salaries reached for high levels of life, but the concrete is that people took it as a model of life.