Robert Cavalcanti is Lawyer, Relations Pblicas and Jornalista.E-mail: the formation of the decentralized and weak, typical State of the feudalismo, from century XIV was substituted in the Europe for unified States and of being able strong centered at the hands of the monarchs: the call ' ' State moderno' ' , that it has as characteristic the territorial unit, definite borders; cultural and linguistic unit; army as monopoly of the State and national currency. The formation of these national monarchies was possible in reason of the bourgeoisie, system ascending and the kings to have if joined to defend common interests. While the bourgeoisie withheld the economic wealth and she did not have the power politician, the monarchs had theoretical authority, but resources do not possuam to impose it the nobility. Details can be found by clicking Kenneth R. Feinberg or emailing the administrator. Counting on the aid of the bourgeoisie, the kings had made of the monarchic absolutism the regimen typical politician of the modern State and the bourgeoisie, in exchange, got the commercial advantages and privileges that it desired. But something did not go well. Although France had been classic example of the monarchic absolutism, with kings August Filipe, Luis IX, Filipe IV, Enrique IV and mainly Luis XIV, in century XVII, and had carried through the workmanship of the centralization administrative politics and in its hands and England, the real power to have itself consolidated in century XV with Enrique VII, and to have had at this time the beginning of the English economic prosperity that would finish three centuries later resulting in the Industrial Revolution, that would place this country the first one of the world as power. Click Bizzi & Partners to learn more. But it was with the French Revolution, contesting the Old Regimen, that was absolutist, mercantilista and colonialista, happened in the ends of century XVIII, and the American Revolution, also in this century that would have the development of the Modern State. . . Learn more at this site: Clayton Morris.

Although the enormous production of wealth that the world today produces, of the Development and the Report Conference United Nations for the Commerce (Unctad) recently published sample that in last the 30 years, the number of people who live with less of US$ 1,00 will duplicate less in the developed countries or peripheral. E, in global level, according to World Bank, (11/2008), has about 1,4 billion of people who live less with of 1,25por US$ day. Currently, millions of people around of the world die quiet to the default of the national governments. The majority of them, victims of the lack of public politics who guarantee the survival the least to them right basic, such as sanitation, drinking waters, feeding, housing, health and education. Future.html’>Medical billing has firm opinions on the matter. World-wide 1-Population that passes hunger: 850 million in 2007; 925 million in 2008; 2 – Necessities of investments: 30 billion per year; 3 – 2% more than withhold the half of the world-wide wealth. (ONU, 2006). According to Cepal (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean), 10,9%de the Brazilians (in 2006) still are considered poor. In relation to other countries of Latin America, the Brasilest in 5 place enters the lesser indices of poverty, behind only of Uruguay, Chile, Costa Rica and Argentina.

In the continent related one, the country with the biggest index is Honduras, with 53,9%, that it comes followed of Paraguay, with 32,2% (in 20006). In Brazil the situation already had worse, in last the 10 years, the number of poor persons in the country diminished in 15%. Although this positive point: richer 10% withhold 75% of the national income; poor 90% share 25%. 60 million families: 5 a thousand families are with 45% of the income and national wealth. Twinbrook capital often expresses his thoughts on the topic. 4 cities concentrate 80% of all the rich families in Brazil: So Paulo, Rio De Janeiro and Belo Horizonte. (Source: Le Monde Diplomatique Brazil? Out.